Category talk:Reviewed

Maxwell (talk) 19:00, 29 October 2023 (UTC) A question. A while back, I was doing a bunch of routine edits of the form "X is an amateur-tiersage study in the field of Y", and there may yet be abilities here and there which got missed for that treatment. Is it okay to fix those when I spot them, or should I refrain even from that in favor of hitting reviewed pages?

Speaking of the reviewed category: every link on this page is now purple for me. Some of those I might have visited a while back, before you gave them the review treatment, but I'm certainly close to done with a first pass on everything so far.

Tao alexis (talk) 19:55, 29 October 2023 (UTC) Yesterday I found 11 sage abilities that I'd failed to include in the "category: sage abilities" at the end. I miss things. Everyone does.

I see that you're fixing spelling errors, but are you making sure that everything that ought to have a link does?  At random I picked a file, "grey ooze," from the reviewed list.  Under advantages it reads, "the defender's shield is eaten ..."  There are three mentions of "shield" on the page.  Is there a link to "shield (weapon)" here?  No.  Took me what, 15 seconds to find a missing link.  I see that the word "weapon" also appears twice and yet there should be a link, "Weapons List" and there isn't.  You can't be serious that those two hundred pages don't have problems.