Difference between revisions of "Talk:Urban Sense (sage study)"
(Created page with "~~~ Has Disciplinarianship been absorbed into Collaboration? And am I correct that Collaboration the study which will let thieves train new thieves?") |
Tao alexis (talk | contribs) m (Tao alexis moved page Talk:Collaboration (sage study) to Talk:Urban Sense (sage study)) |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[User:Maxwell|Maxwell]] ([[User talk:Maxwell|talk]]) Has Disciplinarianship been absorbed into Collaboration? And am I correct that Collaboration the study which will let thieves train new thieves? | [[User:Maxwell|Maxwell]] ([[User talk:Maxwell|talk]]) Has Disciplinarianship been absorbed into Collaboration? And am I correct that Collaboration the study which will let thieves train new thieves? | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[User:Tao alexis|Tao alexis]] ([[User talk:Tao alexis|talk]]) I'm parsing an idea that "authority" in any "in field" study allows a character to "tutor" any person up to 50% the number of points in that study ... and that this rule would be universal. "Instruction" would then allow a character to teach knowledge outside of fields and perhaps up to 75%. I was looking at the instruction rule yesterday and it needs work. I haven't decided what to call this authority-tutor rule, or how to present it (and where) on the wiki, but it's in the back of my mind to do so. | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[User:Tao alexis|Tao alexis]] ([[User talk:Tao alexis|talk]]) '''Collaboration''' should be a kind of "leadership" for thieves; though obviously the rules and organisation would be very different from fighters. | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[User:Maxwell|Maxwell]] ([[User talk:Maxwell|talk]]) 02:18, 10 July 2022 (UTC) I think that a universal tutoring rule is a good idea. For one, it ensures that ability to create new leveled characters is not generally limited to those with a particular study; for another, it provides a concrete mechanism for how non-levels around the world may acquire training in studies, or single abilities, w/o acquiring a character class. | ||
Latest revision as of 20:23, 19 October 2022
Maxwell (talk) Has Disciplinarianship been absorbed into Collaboration? And am I correct that Collaboration the study which will let thieves train new thieves?
Tao alexis (talk) I'm parsing an idea that "authority" in any "in field" study allows a character to "tutor" any person up to 50% the number of points in that study ... and that this rule would be universal. "Instruction" would then allow a character to teach knowledge outside of fields and perhaps up to 75%. I was looking at the instruction rule yesterday and it needs work. I haven't decided what to call this authority-tutor rule, or how to present it (and where) on the wiki, but it's in the back of my mind to do so.
Tao alexis (talk) Collaboration should be a kind of "leadership" for thieves; though obviously the rules and organisation would be very different from fighters.
Maxwell (talk) 02:18, 10 July 2022 (UTC) I think that a universal tutoring rule is a good idea. For one, it ensures that ability to create new leveled characters is not generally limited to those with a particular study; for another, it provides a concrete mechanism for how non-levels around the world may acquire training in studies, or single abilities, w/o acquiring a character class.
