Difference between revisions of "Talk:Catch Fishing (sage ability)"

From The Authentic D&D Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
m
Line 1: Line 1:
 
[[User:Maxwell|Maxwell]] ([[User talk:Maxwell|talk]]) Going by the three-way division you use for [[Athletics (sage study)]] -- Unskilled, Talented, and Skilled -- this ability lacks description for how to resolve fishing by someone who is Talented. I propose a d8 or d10 primary die, and otherwise unchanged from the Unskilled case.
 
[[User:Maxwell|Maxwell]] ([[User talk:Maxwell|talk]]) Going by the three-way division you use for [[Athletics (sage study)]] -- Unskilled, Talented, and Skilled -- this ability lacks description for how to resolve fishing by someone who is Talented. I propose a d8 or d10 primary die, and otherwise unchanged from the Unskilled case.
  
Perhaps your intention was that, outside of Athletics, the division is only two-way, and "Unskilled" means less than 10 pts? But that doesn't square with what you said to me a few months ago about how you'd rule that a ranger with more than 0 and less than 10 points in Forestry could partially use that study's amateur abilities... [I can already hear you telling me that all work is temporary and lasts only until we have a better idea. ;)]
+
I don't think your intention has been that, outside of Athletics, the division is only two-way, and "Unskilled" means anything less than 10 pts. Doesn't square with, for instance, what you said to me a few months ago about how you'd rule that a ranger with more than 0 and less than 10 points in Forestry could partially use that study's amateur abilities... [I can already hear you telling me that all work is temporary and lasts only until we have a better idea. ;)]

Revision as of 08:04, 3 December 2022

Maxwell (talk) Going by the three-way division you use for Athletics (sage study) -- Unskilled, Talented, and Skilled -- this ability lacks description for how to resolve fishing by someone who is Talented. I propose a d8 or d10 primary die, and otherwise unchanged from the Unskilled case.

I don't think your intention has been that, outside of Athletics, the division is only two-way, and "Unskilled" means anything less than 10 pts. Doesn't square with, for instance, what you said to me a few months ago about how you'd rule that a ranger with more than 0 and less than 10 points in Forestry could partially use that study's amateur abilities... [I can already hear you telling me that all work is temporary and lasts only until we have a better idea. ;)]