Difference between revisions of "Talk:Camelback Riding (sage study)"
From The Authentic D&D Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
[[User:Maxwell|Maxwell]] ([[User talk:Maxwell|talk]]) If the fields differ between the different classes, of course, then the sensible thing is " a study within the fields of [field], [field], and [field]". | [[User:Maxwell|Maxwell]] ([[User talk:Maxwell|talk]]) If the fields differ between the different classes, of course, then the sensible thing is " a study within the fields of [field], [field], and [field]". | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[User:Maxwell|Maxwell]] ([[User talk:Maxwell|talk]]) Here is an example of how I resolved this on another study page: [[Logic & Ethics (sage study)]] | ||
Revision as of 20:15, 28 June 2022
Maxwell (talk) Normally when I link a sage field in a study description, I do it like this:Wilderland. When it comes to sage fields which are shared by multiple classes, how should I link the phrase "a study within [insert field here]" when that field link might go to the ranger or the fighter or the paladin or the assassin? ( in the case of animal training).
Maxwell (talk) If the fields differ between the different classes, of course, then the sensible thing is " a study within the fields of [field], [field], and [field]".
Maxwell (talk) Here is an example of how I resolved this on another study page: Logic & Ethics (sage study)
