Difference between revisions of "Talk:Camelback Riding (sage study)"
From The Authentic D&D Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search (Created page with "Normally when I link a sage field in a study description, I do it like this:Wilderland. When it comes to sage fields which are shared by m...") |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Normally when I link a sage field in a study description, I do it like this:[[Ranger Sage Abilities#Wilderland|Wilderland]]. When it comes to sage fields which are shared by multiple classes, how should I link the phrase "a study within [insert field here]"? | Normally when I link a sage field in a study description, I do it like this:[[Ranger Sage Abilities#Wilderland|Wilderland]]. When it comes to sage fields which are shared by multiple classes, how should I link the phrase "a study within [insert field here]"? | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[User:Maxwell|Maxwell]] ([[User talk:Maxwell|talk]]) Upon further reflection, the sensible thing seems to be stating something like " a study within the fields of [field], [field], and [field]" | ||
Revision as of 19:02, 28 June 2022
Normally when I link a sage field in a study description, I do it like this:Wilderland. When it comes to sage fields which are shared by multiple classes, how should I link the phrase "a study within [insert field here]"?
Maxwell (talk) Upon further reflection, the sensible thing seems to be stating something like " a study within the fields of [field], [field], and [field]"
