Difference between revisions of "Talk:Cleric 2nd Level Spells"
From The Authentic D&D Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to searchTao alexis (talk | contribs) |
Tao alexis (talk | contribs) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Need images for 2nd-level spells. Will have time this evening to browse. | Need images for 2nd-level spells. Will have time this evening to browse. | ||
:I'm falling hopelessly behind the number of pages being created. Images and everything else will come in time. Please use "ft." instead of the symbol ' to denote feet. Same rule for inches. | :I'm falling hopelessly behind the number of pages being created. Images and everything else will come in time. Please use "ft." instead of the symbol ' to denote feet. Same rule for inches. | ||
| + | ::Curious about categories: I noticed you listed "Clerical Spells" as a category, so I copied the format and added "Bardic," "Druidic" and "Mage." However, these pages don't exist. Do you want me to continue with this approach and/or should I set up those pages? I figure they'd be similar to an index, just listing all spells (within that category) alphabetically. | ||
| + | :::Probably best if you let me handle the Indexing pages, particularly if you don't see them on the old wiki. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Please do not use ticks for expressing feet. Please use "ft." instead.--[[User:Tao alexis|Tao alexis]] ([[User talk:Tao alexis|talk]]) 18:39, 17 February 2020 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 18:39, 17 February 2020
Need images for 2nd-level spells. Will have time this evening to browse.
- I'm falling hopelessly behind the number of pages being created. Images and everything else will come in time. Please use "ft." instead of the symbol ' to denote feet. Same rule for inches.
- Curious about categories: I noticed you listed "Clerical Spells" as a category, so I copied the format and added "Bardic," "Druidic" and "Mage." However, these pages don't exist. Do you want me to continue with this approach and/or should I set up those pages? I figure they'd be similar to an index, just listing all spells (within that category) alphabetically.
- Probably best if you let me handle the Indexing pages, particularly if you don't see them on the old wiki.
- Curious about categories: I noticed you listed "Clerical Spells" as a category, so I copied the format and added "Bardic," "Druidic" and "Mage." However, these pages don't exist. Do you want me to continue with this approach and/or should I set up those pages? I figure they'd be similar to an index, just listing all spells (within that category) alphabetically.
Please do not use ticks for expressing feet. Please use "ft." instead.--Tao alexis (talk) 18:39, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
