Difference between revisions of "Talk:Piety (sage study)"
(Created page with "~~~ Oops, I think I messed up a bit. I have been linking the individual sage field links, such as Reverence on this page, to the sage abilities for the class in question, foll...") |
Tao alexis (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Regardless, I will continue to move content to this wiki so it's all in one place. At worst, I have to change some links/make some new pages at a later date. | Regardless, I will continue to move content to this wiki so it's all in one place. At worst, I have to change some links/make some new pages at a later date. | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[User:Tao alexis|Tao alexis]] ([[User talk:Tao alexis|talk]]) Sorry I've been out of touch. Yes, you've got me correctly. I'm changing the former policy to the new, the one I've given you. Change things as you can, eventually all discontinuities will be fixed. | ||
Latest revision as of 23:59, 28 June 2022
Maxwell (talk) Oops, I think I messed up a bit. I have been linking the individual sage field links, such as Reverence on this page, to the sage abilities for the class in question, following the example of the existing sage study pages. However, looking again at the link template you gave me, it seems like you actually want separate pages for each field, rather than putting them on the [Class Sage Abilities] pages. For instance, reverence currently links to the paladin sage abilities overview, but you intend for there to be a reverence-specific page in the future, yes?
Regardless, I will continue to move content to this wiki so it's all in one place. At worst, I have to change some links/make some new pages at a later date.
Tao alexis (talk) Sorry I've been out of touch. Yes, you've got me correctly. I'm changing the former policy to the new, the one I've given you. Change things as you can, eventually all discontinuities will be fixed.
