Difference between revisions of "Talk:Camelback Riding (sage study)"

From The Authentic D&D Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
m
Line 1: Line 1:
[[User:Maxwell|Maxwell]] ([[User talk:Maxwell|talk]]) Normally when I link a sage field in a study description, I do it like this:[[Ranger Sage Abilities#Wilderland|Wilderland]]. When it comes to sage fields which are shared by multiple classes, how should I link the phrase "a study within  [insert field here]"?
+
[[User:Maxwell|Maxwell]] ([[User talk:Maxwell|talk]]) Normally when I link a sage field in a study description, I do it like this:[[Ranger Sage Abilities#Wilderland|Wilderland]]. When it comes to sage fields which are shared by multiple classes, how should I link the phrase "a study within  [insert field here]" when that field link might go to the ranger or the fighter or the paladin or the assassin? ( in the case of animal training).
  
[[User:Maxwell|Maxwell]] ([[User talk:Maxwell|talk]]) Upon further reflection, the sensible thing seems to be stating something like " a study within the fields of [field], [field], and [field]"
+
[[User:Maxwell|Maxwell]] ([[User talk:Maxwell|talk]]) If the fields differ between the different classes, of course, then the sensible thing is " a study within the fields of [field], [field], and [field]".

Revision as of 19:13, 28 June 2022

Maxwell (talk) Normally when I link a sage field in a study description, I do it like this:Wilderland. When it comes to sage fields which are shared by multiple classes, how should I link the phrase "a study within [insert field here]" when that field link might go to the ranger or the fighter or the paladin or the assassin? ( in the case of animal training).

Maxwell (talk) If the fields differ between the different classes, of course, then the sensible thing is " a study within the fields of [field], [field], and [field]".