Difference between revisions of "Talk:Action Points"

From The Authentic D&D Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(Created page with "Thank you for this, Sebastian. This post is a beast, but very important.")
 
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
Thank you for this, Sebastian.  This post is a beast, but very important.
 
Thank you for this, Sebastian.  This post is a beast, but very important.
 +
 +
The terms "full combat round" and "full movement" are used interchangeably but neither is clearly defined. I think it would be good to establish and define one of them in the first section and use that throughout the text.
 +
:Right.  I'll address that when I edit the page.--[[User:Tao alexis|Tao alexis]] ([[User talk:Tao alexis|talk]]) 20:54, 16 February 2020 (UTC)Alexis

Latest revision as of 20:54, 16 February 2020

Thank you for this, Sebastian. This post is a beast, but very important.

The terms "full combat round" and "full movement" are used interchangeably but neither is clearly defined. I think it would be good to establish and define one of them in the first section and use that throughout the text.

Right. I'll address that when I edit the page.--Tao alexis (talk) 20:54, 16 February 2020 (UTC)Alexis