Talk:Catch Fishing (sage ability) - Revision history

Tao alexis at 22:39, 15 October 2023

2023-10-15T22:39:14Z

Maxwell at 17:14, 1 January 2023

2023-01-01T17:14:53Z

Tao alexis at 20:00, 3 December 2022

2022-12-03T20:00:43Z

Maxwell at 08:08, 3 December 2022

2022-12-03T08:08:17Z

Maxwell at 08:04, 3 December 2022

2022-12-03T08:04:20Z

Maxwell at 08:02, 3 December 2022

2022-12-03T08:02:00Z

Maxwell: Created page with "~~~ Going by the three-way division you use for Athletics (sage study) -- Unskilled, Talented, and Skilled -- this ability lacks description for how to resolve fishing by..."

2022-12-03T08:00:56Z

Created page with "~~~ Going by the three-way division you use for Athletics (sage study) -- Unskilled, Talented, and Skilled -- this ability lacks description for how to resolve fishing by..."

New page

[[User:Maxwell|Maxwell]] ([[User talk:Maxwell|talk]]) Going by the three-way division you use for [[Athletics (sage study)]] -- Unskilled, Talented, and Skilled -- this ability lacks description for how to resolve fishing by someone who is Talented. I propose a d8 or d10 primary die, and otherwise unchanged from the Unskilled case.

Perhaps your intention was that, outside of Athletics, the division is only two-way, and "Unskilled" means less than 10 pts? But that doesn't square with what you said to me a few months ago about how you'd rule that a ranger with more than 0 and less than 10 points in Forestry could partially use that study's amateur abilities...

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-[[User:Maxwell|Maxwell]] ([[User talk:Maxwell|talk]]) Going by the three-way division you use for [[Athletics (sage study)]] -- Unskilled, Talented, and Skilled -- this ability lacks description for how to resolve fishing by someone who is Talented. I propose a d8 or d10 primary die, and otherwise unchanged from the Unskilled case.
+[[User:Maxwell|Maxwell]] ([[User talk:Maxwell|talk]]) Going by the three-way division you use for Athletics (sage study) -- Unskilled, Talented, and Skilled -- this ability lacks description for how to resolve fishing by someone who is Talented. I propose a d8 or d10 primary die, and otherwise unchanged from the Unskilled case.
 [[User:Tao alexis|Tao alexis]] ([[User talk:Tao alexis|talk]]) I'm not using those three levels as established for every sage ability.  Nor do I intend to.  They're fine when they're needed, but I think an extra distinction in this case just creates unessential detail.
 [[User:Maxwell|Maxwell]] ([[User talk:Maxwell|talk]]) Ah, got it.

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:14, 1 January 2023
Line 2:		Line 2:

	[[User:Tao alexis\|Tao alexis]] ([[User talk:Tao alexis\|talk]]) I'm not using those three levels as established for every sage ability. Nor do I intend to. They're fine when they're needed, but I think an extra distinction in this case just creates unessential detail.		[[User:Tao alexis\|Tao alexis]] ([[User talk:Tao alexis\|talk]]) I'm not using those three levels as established for every sage ability. Nor do I intend to. They're fine when they're needed, but I think an extra distinction in this case just creates unessential detail.
		+
		+	[[User:Maxwell\|Maxwell]] ([[User talk:Maxwell\|talk]]) Ah, got it.

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:00, 3 December 2022
Line 1:		Line 1:
	[[User:Maxwell\|Maxwell]] ([[User talk:Maxwell\|talk]]) Going by the three-way division you use for [[Athletics (sage study)]] -- Unskilled, Talented, and Skilled -- this ability lacks description for how to resolve fishing by someone who is Talented. I propose a d8 or d10 primary die, and otherwise unchanged from the Unskilled case.		[[User:Maxwell\|Maxwell]] ([[User talk:Maxwell\|talk]]) Going by the three-way division you use for [[Athletics (sage study)]] -- Unskilled, Talented, and Skilled -- this ability lacks description for how to resolve fishing by someone who is Talented. I propose a d8 or d10 primary die, and otherwise unchanged from the Unskilled case.
		+
		+	[[User:Tao alexis\|Tao alexis]] ([[User talk:Tao alexis\|talk]]) I'm not using those three levels as established for every sage ability. Nor do I intend to. They're fine when they're needed, but I think an extra distinction in this case just creates unessential detail.

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:08, 3 December 2022
Line 1:		Line 1:
	[[User:Maxwell\|Maxwell]] ([[User talk:Maxwell\|talk]]) Going by the three-way division you use for [[Athletics (sage study)]] -- Unskilled, Talented, and Skilled -- this ability lacks description for how to resolve fishing by someone who is Talented. I propose a d8 or d10 primary die, and otherwise unchanged from the Unskilled case.		[[User:Maxwell\|Maxwell]] ([[User talk:Maxwell\|talk]]) Going by the three-way division you use for [[Athletics (sage study)]] -- Unskilled, Talented, and Skilled -- this ability lacks description for how to resolve fishing by someone who is Talented. I propose a d8 or d10 primary die, and otherwise unchanged from the Unskilled case.
−
−	I don't think your intention has been that, outside of Athletics, the division is only two-way, and "Unskilled" means anything less than 10 pts. Doesn't square with, for instance, what you said to me a few months ago about how you'd rule that a ranger with more than 0 and less than 10 points in Forestry could partially use that study's amateur abilities... [I can already hear you telling me that all work is temporary and lasts only until we have a better idea. ;)]

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:04, 3 December 2022
Line 1:		Line 1:
	[[User:Maxwell\|Maxwell]] ([[User talk:Maxwell\|talk]]) Going by the three-way division you use for [[Athletics (sage study)]] -- Unskilled, Talented, and Skilled -- this ability lacks description for how to resolve fishing by someone who is Talented. I propose a d8 or d10 primary die, and otherwise unchanged from the Unskilled case.		[[User:Maxwell\|Maxwell]] ([[User talk:Maxwell\|talk]]) Going by the three-way division you use for [[Athletics (sage study)]] -- Unskilled, Talented, and Skilled -- this ability lacks description for how to resolve fishing by someone who is Talented. I propose a d8 or d10 primary die, and otherwise unchanged from the Unskilled case.

−	~~Perhaps~~ your intention ~~was~~ that, outside of Athletics, the division is only two-way, and "Unskilled" means less than 10 pts~~? But that doesn~~'t square with what you said to me a few months ago about how you'd rule that a ranger with more than 0 and less than 10 points in Forestry could partially use that study's amateur abilities... [I can already hear you telling me that all work is temporary and lasts only until we have a better idea. ;)]	+	I don't think your intention has been that, outside of Athletics, the division is only two-way, and "Unskilled" means anything less than 10 pts. Doesn't square with, for instance, what you said to me a few months ago about how you'd rule that a ranger with more than 0 and less than 10 points in Forestry could partially use that study's amateur abilities... [I can already hear you telling me that all work is temporary and lasts only until we have a better idea. ;)]

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:02, 3 December 2022
Line 1:		Line 1:
	[[User:Maxwell\|Maxwell]] ([[User talk:Maxwell\|talk]]) Going by the three-way division you use for [[Athletics (sage study)]] -- Unskilled, Talented, and Skilled -- this ability lacks description for how to resolve fishing by someone who is Talented. I propose a d8 or d10 primary die, and otherwise unchanged from the Unskilled case.		[[User:Maxwell\|Maxwell]] ([[User talk:Maxwell\|talk]]) Going by the three-way division you use for [[Athletics (sage study)]] -- Unskilled, Talented, and Skilled -- this ability lacks description for how to resolve fishing by someone who is Talented. I propose a d8 or d10 primary die, and otherwise unchanged from the Unskilled case.

−	Perhaps your intention was that, outside of Athletics, the division is only two-way, and "Unskilled" means less than 10 pts? But that doesn't square with what you said to me a few months ago about how you'd rule that a ranger with more than 0 and less than 10 points in Forestry could partially use that study's amateur abilities...	+	Perhaps your intention was that, outside of Athletics, the division is only two-way, and "Unskilled" means less than 10 pts? But that doesn't square with what you said to me a few months ago about how you'd rule that a ranger with more than 0 and less than 10 points in Forestry could partially use that study's amateur abilities... [I can already hear you telling me that all work is temporary and lasts only until we have a better idea. ;)]