Talk:Law & Policy (sage study) - Revision history

Maxwell at 22:21, 6 July 2022

2022-07-06T22:21:28Z

Tao alexis at 21:13, 6 July 2022

2022-07-06T21:13:59Z

Maxwell at 20:00, 6 July 2022

2022-07-06T20:00:53Z

Maxwell at 20:00, 6 July 2022

2022-07-06T20:00:22Z

Maxwell: Created page with "~~~ The wording in this study seems focused on the case of the cleric, who understands theological law. Is that also supposed to be the case for mages and illusionists, or wo..."

2022-07-06T19:58:52Z

Created page with "~~~ The wording in this study seems focused on the case of the cleric, who understands theological law. Is that also supposed to be the case for mages and illusionists, or wo..."

New page

[[User:Maxwell|Maxwell]] ([[User talk:Maxwell|talk]]) The wording in this study seems focused on the case of the cleric, who understands theological law. Is that also supposed to be the case for mages and illusionists, or would they instead be familiar with the law of the land? (Or are there, perhaps, fewer differences than I am imagining?)

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:21, 6 July 2022
Line 4:		Line 4:

	[[User:Tao alexis\|Tao alexis]] ([[User talk:Tao alexis\|talk]]) Name a law code between 550 and 1650 that is not fundamentally religious in structure. Justinian's code can be interpreted as libertarianism, but would anyone in the 17th century not have seen it as "god's law"? The distinction we make between church and state didn't exist until the revolutionaries invented it out of thin air (and have since failed to firmly establish a dividing line).		[[User:Tao alexis\|Tao alexis]] ([[User talk:Tao alexis\|talk]]) Name a law code between 550 and 1650 that is not fundamentally religious in structure. Justinian's code can be interpreted as libertarianism, but would anyone in the 17th century not have seen it as "god's law"? The distinction we make between church and state didn't exist until the revolutionaries invented it out of thin air (and have since failed to firmly establish a dividing line).
		+
		+	[[User:Maxwell\|Maxwell]] ([[User talk:Maxwell\|talk]]) point thoroughly taken...

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:13, 6 July 2022
Line 2:		Line 2:

	[1] Roe v Wade notwithstanding...		[1] Roe v Wade notwithstanding...
		+
		+	[[User:Tao alexis\|Tao alexis]] ([[User talk:Tao alexis\|talk]]) Name a law code between 550 and 1650 that is not fundamentally religious in structure. Justinian's code can be interpreted as libertarianism, but would anyone in the 17th century not have seen it as "god's law"? The distinction we make between church and state didn't exist until the revolutionaries invented it out of thin air (and have since failed to firmly establish a dividing line).

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:00, 6 July 2022
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	[[User:Maxwell\|Maxwell]] ([[User talk:Maxwell\|talk]]) The wording in this study seems focused on the case of the cleric, who understands theological law. Is that also supposed to be the case for mages and illusionists, or would they instead be familiar with the law of the land -- or are there, perhaps, fewer differences than I am imagining, in post-Enlightenment, separated-church-and-state* America?	+	[[User:Maxwell\|Maxwell]] ([[User talk:Maxwell\|talk]]) The wording in this study seems focused on the case of the cleric, who understands theological law. Is that also supposed to be the case for mages and illusionists, or would they instead be familiar with the law of the land -- or are there, perhaps, fewer differences than I am imagining, in post-Enlightenment, separated-church-and-state[1] America?

−	*Roe v Wade notwithstanding...	+	[1] Roe v Wade notwithstanding...

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:00, 6 July 2022
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	[[User:Maxwell\|Maxwell]] ([[User talk:Maxwell\|talk]]) The wording in this study seems focused on the case of the cleric, who understands theological law. Is that also supposed to be the case for mages and illusionists, or would they instead be familiar with the law of the land~~? (Or~~ are there, perhaps, fewer differences than I am imagining?)	+	[[User:Maxwell\|Maxwell]] ([[User talk:Maxwell\|talk]]) The wording in this study seems focused on the case of the cleric, who understands theological law. Is that also supposed to be the case for mages and illusionists, or would they instead be familiar with the law of the land -- or are there, perhaps, fewer differences than I am imagining, in post-Enlightenment, separated-church-and-state* America?
		+
		+	*Roe v Wade notwithstanding...