Talk:Camelback Riding (sage study) - Revision history

Tao alexis at 00:03, 29 June 2022

2022-06-29T00:03:34Z

Tao alexis at 00:02, 29 June 2022

2022-06-29T00:02:04Z

Maxwell at 20:15, 28 June 2022

2022-06-28T20:15:44Z

Maxwell at 19:13, 28 June 2022

2022-06-28T19:13:43Z

Maxwell at 19:02, 28 June 2022

2022-06-28T19:02:34Z

Maxwell at 19:02, 28 June 2022

2022-06-28T19:02:07Z

Maxwell: Created page with "Normally when I link a sage field in a study description, I do it like this:Wilderland. When it comes to sage fields which are shared by m..."

2022-06-27T21:32:28Z

Created page with "Normally when I link a sage field in a study description, I do it like this:Wilderland. When it comes to sage fields which are shared by m..."

New page

Normally when I link a sage field in a study description, I do it like this:[[Ranger Sage Abilities#Wilderland|Wilderland]]. When it comes to sage fields which are shared by multiple classes, how should I link the phrase "a study within [insert field here]"?

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:03, 29 June 2022
Line 5:		Line 5:
	[[User:Maxwell\|Maxwell]] ([[User talk:Maxwell\|talk]]) Here is an example of how I resolved this on another study page: [[Logic & Ethics (sage study)]]		[[User:Maxwell\|Maxwell]] ([[User talk:Maxwell\|talk]]) Here is an example of how I resolved this on another study page: [[Logic & Ethics (sage study)]]

−	[[User:Tao alexis\|Tao alexis]] ([[User talk:Tao alexis\|talk]]) Eventually, I want to make a page called "Wilderland (field)" that you would link to. Therefore, you wouldn't be linking to the "Ranger Sage Abilities" page at all; the Wilderland page would do to.	+	[[User:Tao alexis\|Tao alexis]] ([[User talk:Tao alexis\|talk]]) Eventually, I want to make a page called "Wilderland (field)" that you would link to. Therefore, you wouldn't be linking to the "Ranger Sage Abilities" page at all; the Wilderland page would do to. I've corrected the logic and ethics page example you gave the way I want it done.

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:02, 29 June 2022
Line 4:		Line 4:

	[[User:Maxwell\|Maxwell]] ([[User talk:Maxwell\|talk]]) Here is an example of how I resolved this on another study page: [[Logic & Ethics (sage study)]]		[[User:Maxwell\|Maxwell]] ([[User talk:Maxwell\|talk]]) Here is an example of how I resolved this on another study page: [[Logic & Ethics (sage study)]]
		+
		+	[[User:Tao alexis\|Tao alexis]] ([[User talk:Tao alexis\|talk]]) Eventually, I want to make a page called "Wilderland (field)" that you would link to. Therefore, you wouldn't be linking to the "Ranger Sage Abilities" page at all; the Wilderland page would do to.

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:15, 28 June 2022
Line 2:		Line 2:

	[[User:Maxwell\|Maxwell]] ([[User talk:Maxwell\|talk]]) If the fields differ between the different classes, of course, then the sensible thing is " a study within the fields of [field], [field], and [field]".		[[User:Maxwell\|Maxwell]] ([[User talk:Maxwell\|talk]]) If the fields differ between the different classes, of course, then the sensible thing is " a study within the fields of [field], [field], and [field]".
		+
		+	[[User:Maxwell\|Maxwell]] ([[User talk:Maxwell\|talk]]) Here is an example of how I resolved this on another study page: [[Logic & Ethics (sage study)]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:13, 28 June 2022
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	[[User:Maxwell\|Maxwell]] ([[User talk:Maxwell\|talk]]) Normally when I link a sage field in a study description, I do it like this:[[Ranger Sage Abilities#Wilderland\|Wilderland]]. When it comes to sage fields which are shared by multiple classes, how should I link the phrase "a study within [insert field here]"?	+	[[User:Maxwell\|Maxwell]] ([[User talk:Maxwell\|talk]]) Normally when I link a sage field in a study description, I do it like this:[[Ranger Sage Abilities#Wilderland\|Wilderland]]. When it comes to sage fields which are shared by multiple classes, how should I link the phrase "a study within [insert field here]" when that field link might go to the ranger or the fighter or the paladin or the assassin? ( in the case of animal training).

−	[[User:Maxwell\|Maxwell]] ([[User talk:Maxwell\|talk]]) ~~Upon further reflection~~, the sensible thing ~~seems to be stating something like~~ " a study within the fields of [field], [field], and [field]"	+	[[User:Maxwell\|Maxwell]] ([[User talk:Maxwell\|talk]]) If the fields differ between the different classes, of course, then the sensible thing is " a study within the fields of [field], [field], and [field]".

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:02, 28 June 2022
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	Normally when I link a sage field in a study description, I do it like this:[[Ranger Sage Abilities#Wilderland\|Wilderland]]. When it comes to sage fields which are shared by multiple classes, how should I link the phrase "a study within [insert field here]"?	+	[[User:Maxwell\|Maxwell]] ([[User talk:Maxwell\|talk]]) Normally when I link a sage field in a study description, I do it like this:[[Ranger Sage Abilities#Wilderland\|Wilderland]]. When it comes to sage fields which are shared by multiple classes, how should I link the phrase "a study within [insert field here]"?

	[[User:Maxwell\|Maxwell]] ([[User talk:Maxwell\|talk]]) Upon further reflection, the sensible thing seems to be stating something like " a study within the fields of [field], [field], and [field]"		[[User:Maxwell\|Maxwell]] ([[User talk:Maxwell\|talk]]) Upon further reflection, the sensible thing seems to be stating something like " a study within the fields of [field], [field], and [field]"